Balkan countries turn to coal to deal with the energy crisis

As Europe is facing rapidly increasing energy prices, as well as gas shortages, countries across the continent are trying to come up with solutions to deal with the crisis. Balkan countries, for example, have started to turn to coal. While that can help overcome certain aspects of the ongoing crisis, it also risks compromising the progress the nations have made in moving away from fossil fuels that are harmful to the environment.

Reuters reported that ‘North Macedonia, once a frontrunner in attracting renewable energy investors, said earlier this month it planned to open two new coal mines to supply power stations. The energy ministry also said it wants to buy 3 million tonnes of coal from neighbouring Kosovo, though no deal has been signed.’

North Macedonia has submitted a plan to open new coal mines in Zivojno, located in the south of the country, and in Gushterica, which is in the west. For the time being, it is not clear how much coal will be produced there.

Kosovo is a country with the world’s fifth largest deposits of lignite, which is a type of soft coal that releases a lot of toxins into the atmosphere during the process of burning. As global energy prices are on the rise, Kosovo will be relying on lignite even more.

Serbia also admitted that it is beginning to increase coal production and that it plans to ‘import 500 tonnes of coal per day from Montenegro,’ Reuters reported.

Environmentalists are worried

In recent years European countries, including those that constitute the Balkans, have been encouraging energy-consumers to improve their energy efficiency, make their supply greener, and reduce their impact on the environment. Hence, it can be argued that the new idea to turn to coal undermines the progress achieved in these areas. Initially, North Macedonia aimed to phase out coal by 2027. Now, this goal has been pushed back by 3 years, to 2030. Bosnia also delayed sustainable energy related plans and delayed the shutting down of coal-fired power plants.  

As VOA News reported, in the past, environmentalists urged EU policymakers to ‘take a tougher stance on air pollution from coal power plants in the Western Balkans, blaming the fumes for 3,900 deaths across Europe each year.’

Now environmentalists are yet again expressing concerns about the Balkans relying more on fossil fuels instead of working towards being more sustainable.

Tougher EU punishments needed

As air pollution is a big problem in Europe, all EU member states have to work towards meeting climate goals that the organisation has been setting. Moreover, most of the time countries that do not try to be more sustainable do not face any punishments for not following the recommendations.

That needs to be changed, especially as the Balkans are now increasingly turning to coal. The recent changes can negatively affect the air quality in the region, thus having an impact on the health of people living there.

Osservatorio Balcani E Caucaso wrote that ‘the 16 coal power plants in the western Balkans cause as much pollution as the 250 plants active within the European Union. The health impact is severe, and not just within the region.’

The energy crisis is a significant challenge to societies across the continent but working on solutions intended to ameliorate the situation should not come at the price of harming the environment.

National Grid is planning to decarbonise by 2050

National Grid in the US announced the plan to decarbonise heating systems in New York state and Massachusetts by 2050. It will be possible to eliminate fossil fuels by using electric heat pumps more and sourcing more renewable natural gas.

Reuters reported that ‘National Grid plans to have New York and Massachusetts using 100% fossil-free gas by 2050, relying on a significant increase in use of RNG produced from farms, landfills, wastewater facilities and imports instead of conventional natural gas.

The utility is targeting 50% of buildings’ heating to come from electric heat pumps with energy sourced from sources like wind and solar.

The other 50% would come from “fossil-free gas” and a hybrid of electric fossil-free gas systems, the company said.’

At the moment, around 57% of heating systems in New York and Massachusetts rely on natural gas and around 25% run on oil.

While the advantages of the plan for the environment are clear, some argue that the measure will trigger higher prices for consumers because electric heat is more pricey.

States’ environmental commitments

‘In 2019, New York legislators approved a bill that committed to slash greenhouse gas emissions 40 percent by 2030, with an overall target of reducing emissions by 85% by 2050,’ Reuters explains.

While the National Grid’s plan concerns New York and Massachusetts, other US states have also set natural gas targets. California, for example, aims to source 5% of the total amount of gas it sells from renewable natural gas by 2022 and 20% 10 years later, by 2030.

In the US there is a lack of federal climate action so states and local governments enjoy a lot of freedom when it comes to introducing policies aiming at protecting the environment. Thanks to various climate-related targets, carbon pollution that is harmful to American communities can be reduced. As CAP observed, however, While state and local progress is important to preventing the worst effects of climate change, federal leadership is also critical.’

UK decarbonisation commitment

The US is not the only country that is undertaking steps to, at least partially, decarbonise its power systems. In 2020, ‘the UK government published its Energy White Paper, which identified nuclear power as a way to help the country achieve the four-fold increase in clean electricity generation needed to achieve its net-zero target by 2050,’ WNN reported. Recently, this plan was updated and now the UK is committed to decarbonise ‘the country’s power system by 2035, instead of the previous target of 2050. The plan focuses on building a secure, home-grown energy sector – including nuclear energy – that reduces reliance on fossil fuels and exposure to volatile global wholesale energy prices.’

The plan aims to remove coal from the UK’s electricity mix no later than 2035. To achieve this goal, the UK has been focusing on developing clean energy technologies and has been moving away from fossil fuels to renewables.

Speeding this transition up is crucial especially now as the UK is facing a severe energy crisis. If most people were sourcing their energy from renewables, gas shortages would not be a major problem. In addition to that, moving to a clean energy and carbon-neutral economy allows to create new kinds of jobs and to promote innovation.

The UK is on the right track to achieve its decarbonisation goals but still a lot needs to be done so the next few years will show whether the country can keep it up.